PV Watts Production Model

Estimate annual grid-connected solar production, monthly solar harvest curves, and utility grid offset metrics.

System & Geographic Criteria

180° = True South, 90° = East, 270° = West

PDF Report Branding (White-Label)

Yield Summary

Annual Solar Yield 9,850 kWh Specific Yield: 1,641 kWh/kW
Utility Offset Target 102.6%
Year-1 Utility Value $1,773
Orientation Loss Factor 98.2%
Composite Tech Derate 71.4%

Monthly Production Curve (kWh)

Comparing monthly solar generation against baseline consumption.

Monthly Breakdown Schedule

Month Solar Production Baseline Bill Net Grid Share Utility Value

How to Use the PV Production Estimator

  1. Enter your system size in kW-DC — input the total DC wattage rating of your solar array (e.g., 6.0 kW for a system with 15 standard 400W modules).
  2. Select your geographical location — choose your US state from the dropdown menu to apply the correct local peak sun hours (PSH) climate data.
  3. Select array mounting type — choose between fixed roof mount, fixed ground mount, or single-axis tracker. Each option automatically applies standard NEC/ASCE baseline derating factors.
  4. Specify module technology type — select standard Mono-Si/Poly-Si, premium high-efficiency N-type, or thin-film modules to apply appropriate technology efficiency parameters.
  5. Set fixed tilt and azimuth angles — input the panel slope in degrees and orientation (where 180° represents true south, 90° is east, and 270° is west).
  6. Enter baseline electric usage and utility retail rate — provide your average monthly energy consumption in kWh and rate in $/kWh to estimate energy offset and annual utility bill savings.

Why PV Production Estimations Matter for Solar Proposals

Accurate solar production modeling is the foundation of any viable PV system design. Regional climate differences mean a 6 kW solar system in sunny Arizona will generate significantly more electricity than the same system in Washington or New York. By modeling peak sun hours (PSH) alongside mounting configurations and module efficiencies, designers can project realistic production curves that ensure the system satisfies both grid constraints and user demands.

Furthermore, system derating factors (such as module efficiency losses, inverter inefficiencies, wiring losses, and dirt buildup) must be calculated to model real-world output. Neglecting these derating factors leads to over-estimating yield, creating unrealistic payback expectations for the customer. Using standard PV Watts methodology, our estimator calculates composite technology derates to present a reliable baseline for ROI calculations.

By combining orientation factors with local irradiance data, solar installers can optimize tilt and azimuth, maximizing annual energy offset and minimizing utility charges. This level of modeling is essential for creating compelling, data-backed customer proposals and meeting local interconnection guidelines.

Worked Example: Commercial System in Phoenix, Arizona

A developer is modeling an 8.0 kW fixed roof-mounted solar array for an office building in Phoenix, Arizona. The panels will be installed at a 30° tilt oriented directly to the south (180° azimuth) using standard monocrystalline panels.

Inputs: System size = 8.0 kW-DC, State = Arizona (6.5 Peak Sun Hours), Mounting = Fixed Roof Mount (0.84 derate), Tech type = Standard (85% efficiency), Tilt = 30°, Azimuth = 180°.

Calculation: Arizona's baseline PSH is 6.5. Standard module efficiency (85%) combined with fixed roof mounting (84% derate) and 4% other system losses gives a composite derate of: 0.85 × 0.84 × 0.96 = 0.685. At 30° tilt and 180° azimuth, the orientation factor is 1.0. The annual production is: 8.0 kW × 6.5 PSH × 365 days × 1.0 orientation factor × 0.685 derate = 13,001 kWh/year. Specific yield is 13,001 / 8.0 = 1,625 kWh/kW.

Result: Estimated annual solar yield = 13,001 kWh. If the baseline electric utility rate is $0.18/kWh, the first-year value of the generated solar power is approximately $2,340, which the installer can confidently integrate into the ROI analysis.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are peak sun hours?

Peak sun hours (PSH) represent the equivalent number of hours per day when solar irradiance averages 1,000 watts per square meter (the standard intensity used for rating solar panels). A location receiving 5 peak sun hours is getting the same amount of solar energy as if it received 5 hours of full, intense midday sun. This metric simplifies annual production modeling across different geographical zones.

How accurate is state-level solar production data?

State-level estimates use average regional peak sun hours and represent a strong baseline for initial project design. However, local microclimates, specific shade profiles, and rooftop layout constraints will introduce minor variations. For final engineering designs and performance guarantees, installers use precise local meteorological database coordinates (e.g., TMY3 weather files).

What is the production difference between fixed-tilt and single-axis tracking solar systems?

Single-axis tracking systems dynamically rotate panels to follow the sun's path from east to west throughout the day, increasing energy yield by 15% to 25% compared to fixed-tilt mounts. Trackers are highly common in utility-scale and large ground-mount solar arrays, whereas residential installations almost exclusively use fixed-tilt configurations due to roof mounting constraints and lower maintenance costs.

Related Free Solar Tools

Ready to Scale Your Solar Business?

Stop calculating manually. Automate wire sizing, permit generation, and compliance checks in one platform.

Automate your full permit pipeline with Solaricy